AT ONE TIME THE BRITISH BRAGGED THAT THEIR EMPIRE WAS SO VAST…SO GREAT THAT THE SUN NEVER SET ON IT.TODAY THERE IS NO EMPIRE FOR THE SUN OR THE MOON FOR THAT MATTER TO SET ON.
AMERICA AND HER PEOPLE BECAME AS DRUNKARDS NOT ONLY BRAGGING ABOUT THE SAME THING OF THE AMERICAN EMPIRE COMPARED TO THE BRITISH EMPIRE,THEY WENT EVEN FUTURE DECLARING TO BE A SUPERPOWER.BUT THAT WAS NOT ENOUGH SO THEY SAID THAT THEY WOULD PREVAIL OVER ALL THROUGH SHEAR MILITARY MIGHT AND THEN PROCLAIMED THEMSELVES TO NO LONGER BE JUST A SUPERPOWER ,BUT THAT THEY WERE THE WORLD’S SOLE HYPERPOWER WHICH COULD SET LAWS ARBITRARILY AND POLICE THE WORLD AS THOUGH SHE WAS GOD HIMSELF.
NOW REMEMBER THAT IN THE BIBLE SATAN PROCLAIMED THE SAME SAYING THAT HE WOULD BE LIKE THE MOST HIGH AND FASHION HIMSELF A KINGDOM.THIS IS AMERICA.IN THE SAME BOOK CALLED BIBLE THE ALMIGHTY WARNED HER(AMERICA),THOUGH THOU SHOULD ASCEND THE CLOUDS TO HEAVEN,I BRING BRING YOU DOWN TO THE PITS OF HELL.
THIS CAN CLEARLY BE UNDERSTOOD WHEN WE LOOK AT AMERICA AND HER CONDITION TODAY;”Volcker Says China’s Rise Highlights Relative U.S. Decline
Share | Email | Print | A A A
By James Tyson and Michael McKee
Sept. 29 (Bloomberg) — Former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker said the rise of China and other emerging economies has underscored a decline in the comparative economic and intellectual leadership of the U.S.
“I don’t know how we accommodate ourselves to it,” Volcker, an economic adviser to President Barack Obama, said in an interview with PBS’s Charlie Rose taped yesterday in New York. “You cannot be dependent upon these countries for three to four trillion dollars of your debt and think that they’re going to be passive observers of whatever you do.”
The former Fed chairman also said unemployment at 9.7 percent will slow the pace of recovery from the U.S. recession as Americans default on mortgages and consumer loans. Moreover, commercial real estate loans are likely to cause further losses for banks.
“This recovery will be slower,” he said. “We can’t just pump up consumption and pump up housing again.”
Group of 20 leaders, meeting in Pittsburgh last week, announced plans for more durable economic growth, including reducing U.S. dependence on overseas capital and cutting the reliance of emerging nations such as China on exports.
World leaders decided that the G-20, which includes emerging economies such as China and Brazil, will replace the Group of Eight as the main forum for global economic coordination. The shift illustrates how the excesses that led to the financial crisis have compelled industrial nations to share governance of the world economy.
The growth of emerging economies is “symbolic of the relative, less dominant position the United States has, not just in the economy but in leadership, intellectual and otherwise,” Volcker said.
The G-20 accounts for about 85 percent of global gross domestic product and was created after a spate of currency devaluations plagued emerging markets from Russia to Thailand in the 1990s. The G-8, which comprises the most advance industrial economies of Europe and North America plus Japan and Russia, accounts for about half of global GDP.
China has overtaken Germany to become the world’s third- largest economy and may soon become the biggest exporter. It passed Japan a year ago as the main foreign investor in U.S. government debt. China, Russia, Brazil and India together hold about 42 percent of international reserve assets, excluding gold.
“I would like to think that given the history of the past, given the strength, actual and potential of the American economy, we can still provide a kind of indispensable element of leadership here,” Volcker, 82, said. “But it’s not going to be dictatorial, I’ll tell you that. It is very hard to herd these cats together.”
Volcker repeated that under a new regulatory structure the Fed should be given primary responsibility for supervising banks rather than a council of regulators led by the U.S. Treasury.
The Treasury has “no professional background and no traditions in the area of banking supervision,” Volcker said.
“In the distribution of authorities among regulatory institutions, it’s really the Federal Reserve that naturally should to be surveying the whole world, so to speak,” he said.
Volcker has criticized the Obama administration’s plan to give the Fed authority to supervise “systemically important” financial firms. Such a designation would imply government readiness to support the firms in a crisis, encouraging excessive risk-taking, he said in said in testimony to the House Financial Services Committee on Sept. 24.
The central bank should instead oversee bank regulation carried out by an independent agency, Volcker has said. The chairman of that agency could also be a vice chairman of the Fed, to increase accountability and ensure the Fed is fully informed.
Volcker is chairman of the Economic Recovery Advisory Board, a body created by Obama in February to recommend responses to the crisis.
Since January, Volcker has advocated that regulators prohibit financial companies whose collapse would pose a risk to the economy — those considered “too big to fail” — from engaging in certain types of trading and investing. The administration wants stricter oversight for such companies and tighter capital and liquidity requirements.
Volcker said the Fed and the White House “were right in providing massive support” to financial markets after the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Sept. 15, 2008, and to bail out American International Group.
“Faced with those emergencies, they did what they had to do at the time,” he said.
While more might have been done ahead of time to prevent Lehman’s demise, “I think if it had been rescued somehow and kept alive, I still think you would have had an attack on the other institutions,” he said. The government’s actions give “succor to the next institution that gets in trouble and to their creditors in particular,” Volcker said.
The interview will air in two parts, on Tuesday and Wednesday on PBS, and will be rebroadcast on Wednesday and Thursday on Bloomberg Television channels around the world as part of a new partnership between Rose and Bloomberg.
To contact the reporter on this story: James Tyson in Washington at email@example.com “————————————————————AND—————“World Bank Head Sees Dollar’s Role Diminishing
Published on 09-29-2009 Email To Friend Print Version
Source: NY Times
WASHINGTON — The president of the World Bank said on Monday that America’s days as an unchallenged economic superpower might be numbered and that the dollar was likely to lose its favored position as the euro and the Chinese renminbi assume bigger roles.
“The United States would be mistaken to take for granted the dollar’s place as the world’s predominant reserve currency,” the World Bank president, Robert B. Zoellick, said in a speech at the School for Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins. “Looking forward, there will increasingly be other options to the dollar.”
Mr. Zoellick, who previously served as the United States trade representative and as deputy secretary of state under President George W. Bush, said that the euro provided a “respectable alternative” for financing international transactions and that there was “every reason to believe that the euro’s acceptability could grow.”
In the next 10 to 20 years, he said, the dollar will face growing competition from China’s currency, the renminbi. Though Chinese leaders have minimized their currency’s use in international transactions, largely so they could keep greater control over exchange rates, Mr. Zoellick said the renminbi would “evolve into a force in financial markets.”
The World Bank, which is financed by governments around the globe and lends money primarily to poor countries, has no say over the economic policies of large nations or over currency matters.
But Mr. Zoellick’s comments were unusual, in part because he seemed intent on being provocative. He argued that the United States and a handful of other rich nations could no longer dominate the world economy and suggested that America was losing its clout. He also took issue with a central piece of the Obama administration’s proposal regarding the country’s financial regulatory system.
“The greenback’s fortunes will depend heavily on U.S. choices,” Mr. Zoellick said. “Will the United States resolve its debt problems without a resort to inflation? Can America establish long-term discipline over spending and its budget deficit?”
Mr. Zoellick criticized President Obama’s plan to put the Federal Reserve in charge of reducing “systemic risk” and to regulate institutions considered too big to fail. Saying that Congress had become uneasy about the Fed’s exercise of emergency powers to bail out financial institutions and prop up credit markets, Mr. Zoellick argued that the Treasury rather than the Fed should get more power because the Treasury was more accountable to Congress.
“In the United States, it will be difficult to vest the independent and powerful technocrats at the Federal Reserve with more authority,” Mr. Zoellick said, adding that “the Treasury is an executive department, and therefore Congress and the public can more directly oversee how it uses any added authority.”